Challenging termination after accepting VRS dues only on refund.
2011 LLR 1009
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Fixed-term employees not entitled to regularization.
2011 LLR 1059
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Principle of ''equal pay for equal work'' not to apply for casual workers.
2011 LLR 1080
DELHI HIGH COURT
Transfer of an employee not to be interfered by the Court.
2011 LLR 1084
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
An enquiry can be interfered only when there is perversity.
2011 LLR 1049
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Contract labour system exploits workers.
2011 LLR 1079
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Provident Fund Act will continue to apply even when the employees are reduced to less than 20.
2011 LLR 1074
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Doctors being equal to God, not to issue false certificates.
2011 LLR 1043
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Back-wages on reinstatement is not a rule of thumb.
2011 LLR 1120
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
An employee, performing managerial functions, not to be a workman.
2011 LLR 1066
DELHI HIGH COURT
Reinstatement is proper when the employee was frightened to resign.
2011 LLR 1084
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Compensation Commissioners require training in Judicial Academies.
2011 LLR 1043
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Dismissal justified for levelling frivolous allegations against a senior officer.
2011 LLR 1011
DELHI HIGH COURT
On transfer of establishment, vendee is also liable for provident fund dues.
2011 LLR 1074
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Heart attack, resulting into death, is an accident for compensation.
2011 LLR 1071
KERALA HIGH COURT
After accepting the dues, VRS can''t be challenged.
2011 LLR 1009
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Appeal, not writ petition, is the remedy for challenging the order of EPF Authority.
2011 LLR 1082
DELHI HIGH COURT
''Wages'' under I.D. Act include travelling concession etc.
2011 LLR 1092
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
No limitation for application under section 33C (2) of the I.D. Act.
2011 LLR 1092
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Consequential relief on reinstatement mean back-wages on higher post.
2011 LLR 1090
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Notice of voluntary retirement can be withdrawn before the effective date.
2011 LLR 1096
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Globalization/liberalization can''t be at the cost of human exploitation.
2011 LLR 1079
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Employer has to contradict the list of employees given by provident fund authority.
2011 LLR 1013
DELHI HIGH COURT
No regularisation of a workman in the absence of specific reference.
2011 LLR 1020
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Compensation is appropriate when a daily-wager raised dispute after 10 years.
2011 LLR 1023
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Bank guarantee will be acceptable as pre-deposit for appeal before EPF Tribunal.
2011 LLR 1018
DELHI HIGH COURT
Retrenchment justified when the Department is shut down.
2011 LLR 1016
DELHI HIGH COURT
A resignation not containing allegations of ''frustration'' can''t be withdrawn.
2011 LLR 1046
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Acceptance of voluntary retirement is always at discretion of the Management.
2011 LLR 1046
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Retrenchment compensation appropriate when permission not taken.
2011 LLR 1028
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Purchaser will not pay the arrears of provident fund of earlier owner.
2011 LLR 1032
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Removal of the bank officer, for granting extra loan, will not be set aside.
2011 LLR 1036
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Ex-parte order by EPF Tribunal is to be set aside.
2011 LLR 1052
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Back-wages can''t be denied because of agricultural income.
2011 LLR 1055
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Check-off facility to a union already allowed cannot be stopped.
2011 LLR 1076
MADRAS HIGH COURT
No relief to workmen who failed to prove 240 days of continuous work.
2011 LLR 1059
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Back-wages not justified when the workmen failed to establish unemployment.
2011 LLR 1059
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Reinstatement even to a daily wager is proper in the absence of enquiry or compensation.
2011 LLR 1086
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
High Court has limited powers with the order of the Tribunal declining to accord approval for dismissal.
2011 LLR 1113
DELHI HIGH COURT
Awarding exorbitant compensation without appreciating evidence is not proper.
2011 LLR 1043
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
A Judge must be conscious of human suffering and human feeling.
2011 LLR 1105
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Interest on back-wages is justified.
2011 LLR 1092
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
After conducting the enquiry into the misconduct it can''t be contended that workman was temporary.
2011 LLR 1020
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Disciplinary Authority can change its views after receiving explanation to the show-cause notice.
2011 LLR 1049
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Accident compensation can be claimed either in civil suit or under Employees'' Compensation Act.
2011 LLR 1050
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Various factors are relevant for granting relief to a terminated workman.
2011 LLR 1024
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Reliance by Labour Court , on zerox copies of the documents, is erroneous.
2011 LLR 1059
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Rejecting compensation claim, on technical grounds, would result in great injustice.
2011 LLR 1105
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
