Disciplinary Authority must record reasons for disagreeing with Enquiry Officer.
2013 LLR 897
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Partners are not to be included in a firm for coverage under Provident Fund Act.
2013 LLR 981
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
A Personnel Manager of a Company is not a ''workman'' under I.D. Act.
2013 LLR 912
DELHI HIGH COURT
Enquiry issue must be decided at first instance.
2013 LLR 924
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Evidence Act not applicable in industrial proceedings.
2013 LLR 927
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Unauthorised & habitual absence is a serious misconduct to justify dismissal.
2013 LLR 970
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Workers & Management will be bound by Award of Labour Court.
2013 LLR 962
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Criminal trial and enquiry proceedings are entirely different.
2013 LLR 952
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Enquiry proceeding sans prescribed procedure will be vitiated
2013 LLR 938
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
25% towards labour for ESI contribution when payment includes material also is justified.
2013 LLR 916
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Compensation not reinstatement is appropriate relief to a daily wager.
2013 LLR 967
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Reinstatement not appropriate for a workman caught stealing property of establishment.
2013 LLR 925
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Prosecution for provident fund can''t be quashed at initial stage.
2013 LLR 934
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Dismissal justified for fraud and misappropriation, etc.
2013 LLR 986
JHARKHAND HIGH COURT
Principal employer has primary duty to pay ESI contribution.
2013 LLR 991
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Prosecution for non-implementation of the Award is untenable when reinstated workman never reported to join.
2013 LLR 999
JHARKHAND HIGH COURT
Assaulting passenger by bus driver will justify dismissal.
2013 LLR 995
DELHI HIGH COURT
Reinstatement is to be set aside in the absence of evidence.
2013 LLR 927
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Normal death even during the course of employment will not attract accident compensation.
2013 LLR 946
GAUHATI HIGH COURT
Interference by Labour Court in dismissal after enquiry not justified.
2013 LLR 970
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Termination of service can be challenged in Labour Court only after raising dispute before Conciliation Officer.
2013 LLR 962
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Enquiry will not vitiate for non-supply of enquiry report to the delinquent.
2013 LLR 956
JHARKHAND HIGH COURT
Additional gratuity out of settlement not payable to an employee already retired.
2013 LLR 954
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
A claim rejected in Civil Court can''t be raised under Industrial Disputes Act.
2013 LLR 919
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Enquiry Committee cannot act as Presenting Officer in enquiry
2013 LLR 938
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Loaders/unloaders in regular activity are coverable under ESI Act.
2013 LLR 916
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Employer not employee has to lead evidence first in the enquiry
2013 LLR 942
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Reasons are necessary if Labour Court modifies punishment.
2013 LLR 960
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Reinstatement with back-wages will not be appropriate when termination is held illegal.
2013 LLR 967
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Temporary misappropriation amounts to breach of trust.
2013 LLR 934
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Area Sales Manager will not be a ''workman'' under I.D. Act.
2013 LLR 922
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Existence of employer-employee relationship to be decided as preliminary issue.
2013 LLR 993
KERALA HIGH COURT
Tribunal justified in granting status quo to bus drivers/conductors engaged through contractor.
2013 LLR 974
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Employer-employee relationship can be established by documentary evidence.
2013 LLR 927
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Compensation only when death caused in accident
2013 LLR 946
GAUHATI HIGH COURT
Opinion of hand-writing expert can prove the forgery.
2013 LLR 962
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Raising industrial dispute after 29 years is rightly to be rejected.
2013 LLR 962
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Performing work of regular nature is to be covered by ESI Act
2013 LLR 916
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
It is employer to prove charges against the employee in enquiry.
2013 LLR 942
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Reinstatement is not proper on dismissal for unauthorized absence.
2013 LLR 960
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Compensation will depend on nature of employment, length of service etc.
2013 LLR 967
ORISSA HIGH COURT
An enquiry is not vitiated merely one copy of the order sheet was not provided.
2013 LLR 925
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
A Director can escape from prosecution for non-deposit of EPF if he proves to be not concerned.
2013 LLR 934
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
No interference by High Court in absence of allegations about violation of natural justice.
2013 LLR 986
JHARKHAND HIGH COURT
A workman may be temporary, permanent employee or even a probationer.
2013 LLR 993
KERALA HIGH COURT
Reinstatement who has just worked for 240 days not justified.
2013 LLR 973
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Reference for determination of ''employer-employee'' relationship is not to be interfered.
2013 LLR 974
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Claimant has to prove his case.
2013 LLR 927
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Termination Can''t invoke section 33C(2) of ID Act.
2013 LLR 910
KERALA HIGH COURT
Termination of probationer does not tantamount to illegal retrenchment.
2013 LLR 899
DELHI HIGH COURT
Termination during probationary period without stigma is covered under section 2(oo)(bb) of the ID Act.
2013 LLR 909
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Engagement of Casuals or Temporary does not amount to unfair Labour Practice.
2013 LLR 899
DELHI HIGH COURT
Compensation appropriate when retrenchment compensation not paid.
2013 LLR 909
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
