Partners not to be counted as employees for coverage under Provident Fund Act. and ESI contribution not to be deposited when salary crosses Rs.15,000 pm.
2016 LLR 939
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Partners not to be counted as employees for coverage under Provident Fund Act. and Partners not to be counted as employees for coverage under Provident Fund Act.
2016 LLR 936
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Partners not to be counted as employees for coverage under Provident Fund Act.
2016 LLR 934
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Persons engaged through contractor are also 'workmen'.
2016 LLR 996
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
It is for the employee to prove that he is a 'workman' under ID Act
2016 LLR 986
KERALA HIGH COURT
It is for the employee to prove that he is a 'workman' under ID Act and It is for the employee to prove that he is a 'workman' under ID Act
2016 LLR 984
JHARKHAND HIGH COURT
It is for the employee to prove that he is a 'workman' under ID Act
2016 LLR 976
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
It is for the employee to prove that he is a 'workman' under ID Act
2016 LLR 964
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Denial of representation of advocate by the workman will vitiate enquiry when the management representative was law graduate.
2016 LLR 950
DELHI HIGH COURT
Workman has to prove to have worked for 240 days in a year.
2016 LLR 948
DELHI HIGH COURT
Show cause notice/charge-sheet cannot be challenged in Writ Petition. Bom
2016 LLR 947
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Benefit of acquittal in criminal trial can be a basis for relief in disciplinary proceedings.
2016 LLR 944
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
When an order passed by the EPF Authority is illegal, interference by the Writ Court is not barred.
2016 LLR 940
PATNA HIGH COURT
It is for the employee to prove that he is a 'workman' under ID Act and It is for the employee to prove that he is a 'workman' under ID Act and It is for the employee to prove that he is a 'workman' under ID Act
2016 LLR 973
PATNA HIGH COURT
It is for the employee to prove that he is a 'workman' under ID Act and It is for the employee to prove that he is a 'workman' under ID Act and It is for the employee to prove that he is a 'workman' under ID Act and It is for the employee to prove that he is a 'workman' under ID Act
2016 LLR 968
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Denial of representation of advocate by the workman will vitiate enquiry when the management representative was law graduate. and Denial of representation of advocate by the workman will vitiate enquiry when the management representative was law graduate. and Denial of representation of advocate by the workman will vitiate enquiry when the management representative was law graduate.
2016 LLR 958
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Partners not to be counted as employees for coverage under Provident Fund Act. and Partners not to be counted as employees for coverage under Provident Fund Act.
2016 LLR 932
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Different establishments being run independently, by mother and son, not to be clubbed for coverage under Provident Fund Act.
2016 LLR 925
KERALA HIGH COURT
Unless prejudice is caused, non-furnishing of enquiry report not illegal. Jhar.
2016 LLR 920
JHARKHAND HIGH COURT
Withdrawal of customary concession without notice also violates section 9A of the ID Act. and Termination of trainees continuing for over 4 years without imparting of training is to be quashed.
2016 LLR 915
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Withdrawal of customary concession without notice also violates section 9A of the ID Act.
2016 LLR 910
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Withdrawal of customary concession without notice also violates section 9A of the ID Act.
2016 LLR 905
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Abandonment of employment by workman be presumed only when an enquiry is held against him.
2016 LLR 903
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Abandonment of employment by workman be presumed only when an enquiry is held against him.
2016 LLR 901
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Abandonment of employment by workman be presumed only when an enquiry is held against him.
2016 LLR 899
DELHI HIGH COURT
An order passed behind the back is liable to be set aside
2016 LLR 897
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
An order passed behind the back is liable to be set aside.
2016 LLR 1006
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Writ Court cannot sit as an Appellate Court to re-appreciate evidence.
2016 LLR 1004
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Educational Institutions are also covered under ESI Act.
2016 LLR 1001
GAUHATI HIGH COURT
