2024 LLR WEB 14 (DELHI HIGH COURT)
Mere non-maintenance of seniority list would not imply that the workman was in continuous service

A. INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT, 1947 - Sections 25F, 25G & 25H - Violation of Statute - Prayer for reinstatement in service - Industrial disputes raised by Appellant-workman who was discontinued in service - Labour Court held that workman not entitled for any relief - Single Judge dismissed petition filed against Labour Court order - Division Bench Held, no document produced by workman to establish claim that she has put in 240 days of service in a calendar year - As worker has miserably failed to prove that she had worked for 240 days in a calendar year question of violation of Section 25F of Act does notarise - No violation of Sections 25G & H of Act as it was not a case of retrenchment of a worker - She was not able to establish that persons appointed after her have been retained in service - Took shelter of the provisions of Act after lapse of four years - Impugned order warrant no interference - Appeal dismissed. [Paras 49, 65, 66, 79]
B. CONTINUOUS EMPLOYMENT - Statement of w... subscribe to read more..