| 2026 LLR WEB 967 -
DELHI HIGH COURT Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act confers a limited execution-like jurisdiction and cannot be invoked to adjudicate a disputed entitlement not previously recognised or adjudicated. LABOUR LAW - Industrial Disputes Act - Section 33C(2) - Scope of Labour Court jurisdiction - Computation versus adjudication - Travelling Allowance for Defence Assistant post-superannuation - Bip...... read full judgement |
| 2026 LLR WEB 966 -
DELHI HIGH COURT Findings of a Labour Court based on appreciation of evidence are not open to interference in writ jurisdiction unless perverse, without jurisdiction, or in breach of natural justice. LABOUR LAW - Writ jurisdiction - Scope of interference with Labour Court findings - Reinstatement and back wages declined - Voluntary resignation - Consolidated compensation - Articles 226 and 22...... read full judgement |
| 2026 LLR WEB 965 -
DELHI HIGH COURT A writ challenging POSH Act proceedings and consequential court-martial action is premature where a statutory pre-confirmation appeal on identical grounds remains pending. SEXUAL HARASSMENT - Internal Complaints Committee - Coram non judice - Composition contrary to Section 4, POSH Act - Violation of natural justice - Consequential disciplinary/court-martial procee...... read full judgement |
| 2026 LLR WEB 964 -
DELHI HIGH COURT Once a workman discharges the initial burden with prima facie material, mere denial by the management cannot dislodge the employer-employee relationship. LABOUR LAW - Employer-employee relationship - Burden of proof - Prima facie material - Control and supervision test - Scope of writ jurisdiction - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - The p...... read full judgement |