2025 LLR WEB 476 - MADRAS HIGH COURT As per standing orders, employee may be required to obtain written permission for engagement in any other employment and it may only be granted if the activity does not affect his duties and interests of the factory. INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYMENT (STANDING ORDERS) ACT, 1946 - Petitioner Public Servant employed with a Government undertaking was charged under Section 168 IPC for acting as a private PF and ESI consultant...... read full judgement

2025 LLR WEB 475 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT Labour Court, while exercising jurisdiction under Sections 33C(2) and 33C(3) of the ID Act, must independently determine material issues such as cut-off date for payment. INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT, 1947 - Sections 33C(2) and 33C(3) - Labour Court Order - Jurisdiction - Procedural Lapse - Remand - Petitioner challenged the Labour Court's order dated 09.03.2015...... read full judgement

2025 LLR WEB 474 - MADRAS HIGH COURT Lumpsum compensation in lieu of reinstatement is proper when the workman was now gainfully employed and had earlier been paid wages under section 17B of the ID Act. INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT, 1947 - Approval of Dismissal - Fairness of Domestic Enquiry - Transfer of Undertaking - Compensation in lieu of Reinstatement - Writ Jurisdiction - Articles 226 and 227 of...... read full judgement

2025 LLR WEB 473 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT Misappropriation of cash, especially by bank officials, is a grave misconduct justifying dismissal. CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION - Service Law - Departmental Proceedings - Double Jeopardy - Natural Justice - Maintainability - Scope of Judicial Review - Petitioner challenged disciplinary...... read full judgement