2025 LLR WEB 523 - MADRAS HIGH COURT Unless an applicant is considered to be a dependant under Section 2(1)(d) of the Employee's Compensation Act, merely because he is a legal heir of the deceased employee, the employers not expected to disburse the amount. EMPLOYEES' COMPENSATION ACT, 1923 - Writ petition by major unmarried son of a deceased employee seeking release of compensation deposited by employer - Held, High Court dismissed the petition and...... read full judgement

2025 LLR WEB 522 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT A compromise entered into between the parties during the pendency of a dispute is a "settlement" under section 33C(2) of the ID Act. INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT, 1947 & PAYMENT OF WAGES ACT, 1936 - Writ petition by petitioner against Labour Court's dismissal of claim under Section 33C(2) for recovery of wages based on compromise...... read full judgement

2025 LLR WEB 521 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT In case of misconduct or indiscipline proven, but there are technical defects in termination, compensation may be awarded instead of reinstatement. INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT, 1947 / JUDICIAL REVIEW & LABOUR REMEDIES - Full Bench reference upon appeals by daily wage/casual workmen petitioners challenging their oral termination, dealing...... read full judgement

2025 LLR WEB 520 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT An application under Section 33C(1) of the ID Act is maintainable, when the amount due is not in dispute. INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT, 1947 - Writ petition by terminated workman seeking recovery of back wages and consequential benefits under Section 33C(1) based on ex-parte Tribunal award...... read full judgement